A three-month window. No notice. Clausework holds the evidence against the clauses it satisfies, runs the internal audits, and keeps the pack ready to issue.
Evidence that cannot be produced cannot be assessed.
Cloud drives, local drives, paper. Nothing connects a document to the clause it satisfies.
One person holds the map. It works until they are on leave inside the window.
Required across the year, run on paper, and the findings never reach the record.
One document answers every clause it satisfies. Nothing counts until a person accepts it.
Questions written for each clause, with what to look for and what a finding sounds like.
Nobody audits their own work unnoticed. When the two names match, the record says so.
Findings land against their clause. Readiness is a by-product, not a project.
Ask in plain language. Answers are drawn only from evidence a person has confirmed. Where nothing is held, it says so.
It is whether you can produce it that morning, in the room, without the one person who knows where it is.
Thirty minutes, screen shared. We walk your position, not a script.
Nothing is transmitted from this page. Open it as an email to send.
No. If a full system is properly implemented, the audit-readiness overlap is substantial and we are unlikely to be worth the change. Clausework is built for sites running on shared drives, spreadsheets and paper.
No. The certification body determines the grade after audit. Clausework shows an internal readiness position built only from findings your team has recorded, and labels it as such.
A named person at your site. The system proposes with a confidence score and its reasoning. Nothing counts towards coverage, enters the pack or is cited until someone accepts it, and the decision carries their name and the date.
They remain yours. Held in the UK or EU, encrypted, never used to train models, with a documented export path that survives the end of the contract.
Phone or tablet, offline capable, syncing when a signal returns. Paper entry afterwards remains an option.
Evidence is held against topics as well as clause numbers, so one procedure can satisfy requirements under more than one certificate without being prepared twice. Food Safety is supported today.
Priced per site, by size and number of users. We would rather quote against your position than publish a figure that is wrong for you.
In development, with a transition period before audits begin against it. Requirements largely move rather than disappear — what expires is the mapping. Re-confirming mappings inside a system is a review task rather than a rebuild.